![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

Lot's of controversy about Ms. Mayer rushing to kill off the working from home folks. Speculations, "why is she doing it"? Nossik thinks this is some strategy to get rid of the dead wood who got too comfortable doing nothing. If that's true, it's plain stupid. No need to invite people to the office to fire them. And no need to bring them in to find out whether they are useless. All of them have supervisors, peers, etc. Any person with corporate experience knows this. She is not stupid. Nossik is wrong.
Another version - she is trying to "shake up" the company. Much needed shock to the system... Again, highly doubtful. This more like like stub to the heart for a Silicon Valley company -- anybody worth keeping will get pissed off and leave. Engineers I mean. Just a wrong thing that goes again the culture not just of Yahoo, but the whole region.
What I think is happening is actually quite simple. Marissa is managing. She is managing the best she can.
Let me explain.
It has been widely publicized (by her mostly; oh well, at least she is yet to write a book on how to build a carrier) that she is a workaholic who used to work 130 (sic!) hours at Google at first, and 90 hours are the norm to her. I believe it. She looks like one of those marathon running, hyper-multitasking, learn a new language on the plane while handling 3 conference calls at once types you run into at the upper echelons of the corporate world. (Typically de-facto single w/o children btw). So I can see how the atmosphere of complacency at Yahoo (where most good people left long ago and those who need a pay check and a quite place to work stayed) is deeply offensive to her. The question is, what to do about it? How to get those folks to "sleep under their desks" and work 90 hrs. How to energize the soldiers? Never the easy topic.
I once had a lecture in B-school taught by a 4 star general, former Head of Joint Chiefs. The guy was 5 foot 6. When he walked, in civil clothes, we stood up. When he spoke we listened. When he stated, we believed. If he asked us to do something we would...
So this is where big words like charisma, leadership, vision comes into play. The ability to lead PEOPLE, not projects.
The trouble is, Ms. Mayer ain't got them. With due respect, Marissa looks, and more importantly, sounds to me like Gilly from SNL, but that's just me.
On a serious note, here is something Steve Tobak back in Aug 2012. Pretty far sighted, IMO.
She's got such a rock star reputation that people seem to forget that
Mayer has only been out of school for 13 years and her only experience
was more or less a rocket ship to the stars. That means her ability to
handle obstacles and adversity and lead a turnaround in a highly
competitive market is untested. It also means she may only know one way
of managing, the Google way. And that may not transfer to a company like
Yahoo. One size does not fit all in the corporate world.
I think we're seeing a brilliant, talented, ridiculously driven and
hard working person whose choices and behavior have been rewarded to an
extend that most of us can't imagine. In other words, the universe is
saying, "You did great; keep doing what you're doing."
Since her talents and motivation are unassailable, that only leaves her
limited experience and behavior. And therein lies the rub. In her
behavior, I see both good and not-so-good signs. I see fearlessness and
strength, but I also see some grandiosity and immaturity. If she can
learn to temper the latter, to develop some humility and gain some
perspective, I think that would bode well for her and Yahoo's future.
So far, does not look that way. Oh well, don't shoot the manager. She is doing the best she can.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-26 08:10 pm (UTC)I have read accounts of her management style at Google that are quite disturbing. My only question is how she managed to stay at Google for so long. I understand that accomplishments in one area can mask incompetence in another, like people management, but still.... that was a long time that she acted like a complete asshole.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-26 08:53 pm (UTC)I am not saying she is a mediocre employee. but she could be, and some say was, mediocre in terms of people skills. That would explain the new policy, would not it?
Second, apparently she did not do as well as press speculated. She did not make SVP, which is strange for the "mother" of the most profitable innovation of Google (AdSense) and an early employee? That begs the question, why?
It is possible that instead of "stealing" the hottest executive at Google, Yahoo managed to attract someone whose career ran into a wall due to own limitation, and who was ready to jump ship. Good for Marissa, not so much for Yahoo ;)
Same article from Steve Tobak:
Why didn't Mayer go further at Google? Yes, she was a vice president, but Google probably has hundreds of VPs. She was not a member of Google's senior leadership team and, if she really is CEO material, she should have been. Instead, she was passed over for promotion to Senior VP several times. It bears mentioning that one of those who did make the grade is the aforementioned Susan Wojcicki.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-26 09:41 pm (UTC)I do not know enough facts, so just intuitively - it feels anything is better for Yahoo. To rock the boat. If it was destined to die, it will die anyway and the one with fireworks is better than quiet slow death. May be.
Now, from your perspective - if she was not a good candidate, who you'd think could be a better one (not that they would take the job..) but I am just curious.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-26 10:08 pm (UTC)I would hire Eric Schmidt.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-27 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-28 05:34 pm (UTC)